The confusion that exists between DMLS and DMLM needs to be addressed. This article is intended to clarify an aspect of metal 3D printing terminology that is commonly misunderstood and often used incorrectly.
DMLM = DMLS
DMLS = DMLM because they are identical in value!
To understand the basis for this statement, here is a simple analogy.
Visualize a bucket of ice cubes on your conference table.
If left to sit for a short while at room temperature, the individual cubes will soon stick to each other, such that if you try to pull out one cube you will most likely get a random glob of multiple cubes stuck together. This fusing of cubes together is analogous to the most common interpretation or use of the word ‘sintering’. Note that the properties of the glob of cubes may or may not resemble the properties of an individual cube as there will likely be pockets of air, or different density ice, interspersed within the mass of ice.
If you left this same bucket of ice cubes out on the table long enough for all the cubes to melt, you would have a bucket of water. If you put that bucket of water back in the freezer it would solidify into effectively one large homogenous and fully dense piece of ice. This is analogous to what happens in DMLM and DMLS 3D printing with metals.
The laser provides enough heat (energy) to melt the metal particles the laser is directed at and then, as the laser moves on, the melt pool rapidly solidifies into a fully dense homogenous structure. Note in this case that the properties of this new block of ice exactly resemble the properties of the individual ice cubes we started with and do not have air, or different density ice, interspersed within the mass.
So sintering is not melting.
Sintering Does Have Its Place
Note that in traditional sintering of powder metal all kinds of processes were developed to address the porosity or fill the interstitial spaces between particles – like infiltration and hipping. These processes are not needed with DMLS or DMLM as the resultant structure is fully-dense as produced.
If you actually needed a portion of a part to be sintered within a DMLM part, let’s say the center, it is possible to change the power of the laser for that defined area of the part, and then turn it back up to complete the rest of the part, resulting in a part with a less dense/solid center. Kind of like a piece of hard candy with a soft, chewy core.
EOS Terminology Change
EOS coined (trademarked) the name DMLS, undoubtedly in an attempt to brand their technology. Unfortunately, this was a misnomer, and very misleading. When using EOS default parameters, a melt pool is formed and a fully-dense structure, equivalent to wrought, results. This is identical to processes referred to as DMLM.
In a statement intended to clarify, EOS recently stated that, going forward, they would prefer the word ‘solidification’ (as opposed to ‘sintering’) be used in describing their DMLS (Direct Metal Laser Solidification) process.
Finally, note that there are sintered-based 3D printing technologies out there as well, but EOS is not one of them – EOS is melt-pool based. These other equipment makers do use sintering - but as a secondary step in their process – heating the printed part in an oven to harden it and reduce its porosity.
The expert metal 3D printing technicians at GPI Prototype and Manufacturing Services can help you successfully incorporate metal 3D printing into your next prototyping, manufacturing or product design project. At GPI – We build the part with you, NOT apart from you.